Body: Medium
Wrapper: Havana 2000
Binder: Indonesian
Filler: Dominican (Cuban seed)
MSRP: $4.50
This is hands-down a very beautiful cigar. The box-press gives it a unique look, especially as it is not "evenly" box-pressed, but rather more rectangular. The construction feels spot-on, and the wrapper has no major flaws. The band is attractive as well, not as obnoxious as Gurkhas normally are. The cold pre-draw gave me a taste of berries, with spice on my lips. I couldn't wait to light it up.
To start things off, the cigar had a mild-medium body, unlike the description. The predominant taste in the first third was a sort of leathery-oak combination, with a little spice mixed in to keep things interesting. As I progressed through the first third, the spice got progressively stronger... but practically dropped off about halfway through the first third, which caught me off-guard. It was still there, but not nearly as much.
As I reach the last third, I began to notice a different taste entering the flavor profile, barely noticeable. It took a couple puffs to place it - berries (remember my cold-draw?). As I continued through the smoke, this flavor became more predominant until it overshadowed the aforementioned oak-and-leather combination, becoming the predominant flavor. The spice makes a little bit of a comeback, but is phased out by the end. The flavors were dynamic enough to keep a more experienced smoker entertained, but simple enough for anyone to enjoy - a great combination.
Overall this was a great cigar. It is very enjoyable smoke for those that prefer the flavors I've mentioned (leathery-oak and berries towards the end, with some spice). After writing this, I looked up the info for the header and found out that CA had rated it a solid 90 - impressive. I'm not giving it a 90 just yet (for me, a cigar has to knock me off my feet to get a 90), but you should get over your aversion to Gurkha and check this smoke out if you see it lying around for a good price.
Overall: 4.3/5
Final Grade (factors in price): 4.2/5
Angolom
No comments:
Post a Comment